Skip to main content
Cloudy icon
42º

Counties where children have the best opportunity for economic mobility in Michigan

Stock image. Karolina Grabowska (Pexels)

Americans have long understood that their birthplace can significantly affect their futures, and academics have increasingly been able to connect tangible early life factors like where they live and the friendships they’ve cultivated with potential future income.

Among the most recent studies shedding light on what's known as economic mobility—a person's ability to move themselves and their families up the socioeconomic ladder over their lifetime—are a series of papers authored by Harvard University researchers leveraging vast troves of social networking data.

Recommended Videos



As part of a national analysis, Wealth Enhancement Group used data from Harvard University's Social Capital Atlas project to identify where in Michigan children have the best (and worst) chances at upward economic mobility.

The research draws on a privacy-protected dataset representing 21 billion friendships from Facebook made public through its parent company Meta's Data for Good project. It also uses anonymous tax records, according to the authors. The scholars assigned a score to locales according to how economically connected low- and high-income people living in the area have historically been over at least a decade, per that data. The dataset does not include scores for about 180 of the 3,000 or so counties in the U.S.

The research attempts to fill in the gaps of previous efforts to study American economic mobility that did not consider a person's vast social networks nor their importance in creating better lives for themselves and their children.

It turns out the ability to cultivate friendships linking people of different socioeconomic backgrounds with one another is the strongest factor in determining whether a child can surpass the earning potential of their parents, Harvard researchers found. They call this economic connectedness.

Read on to find out where economic connectedness is strongest in your state.

Canva

#50. Jackson County

- Economic connectedness: 0.76 - Median Income: $57,746 - Population: 160,765 --- 85.7% white --- 7.7% Black --- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.8% Asian

Canva

#49. Sanilac County

- Economic connectedness: 0.76 - Median Income: $52,459 - Population: 40,829 --- 95.4% white --- 0.5% Black --- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.2% Asian

Bernie Parsons // Shutterstock

#48. Bay County

- Economic connectedness: 0.77 - Median Income: $52,510 - Population: 104,050 --- 93.1% white --- 1.4% Black --- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.5% Asian

Canva

#47. Van Buren County

- Economic connectedness: 0.77 - Median Income: $61,549 - Population: 75,550 --- 84.4% white --- 3.5% Black --- 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.8% Asian

Canva

#46. Mason County

- Economic connectedness: 0.78 - Median Income: $55,035 - Population: 29,103 --- 93.3% white --- 1.1% Black --- 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.5% Asian

Roberto Galan // Shutterstock

#45. Gratiot County

- Economic connectedness: 0.78 - Median Income: $53,347 - Population: 41,758 --- 89.3% white --- 5.9% Black --- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.6% Asian

Canva

#44. Manistee County

- Economic connectedness: 0.78 - Median Income: $54,428 - Population: 24,939 --- 89.9% white --- 3.3% Black --- 1.3% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.3% Asian

Canva

#43. Newaygo County

- Economic connectedness: 0.78 - Median Income: $54,235 - Population: 49,653 --- 91.3% white --- 0.9% Black --- 0.7% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.4% Asian

Canva

#42. Menominee County

- Economic connectedness: 0.79 - Median Income: $52,457 - Population: 23,477 --- 93.8% white --- 0.5% Black --- 2% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.4% Asian

Roberto Galan // Shutterstock

#41. Presque Isle County

- Economic connectedness: 0.79 - Median Income: $52,181 - Population: 12,976 --- 96.2% white --- 0.5% Black --- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.5% Asian

Canva

#40. Antrim County

- Economic connectedness: 0.79 - Median Income: $60,378 - Population: 23,427 --- 95% white --- 0.2% Black --- 1% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.3% Asian

Canva

#39. Iron County

- Economic connectedness: 0.8 - Median Income: $45,792 - Population: 11,580 --- 94.5% white --- 1.2% Black --- 0.8% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.5% Asian

Canva

#38. Delta County

- Economic connectedness: 0.8 - Median Income: $51,117 - Population: 36,836 --- 91.7% white --- 0.3% Black --- 2% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.6% Asian

Canva

#37. Gogebic County

- Economic connectedness: 0.8 - Median Income: $41,948 - Population: 14,858 --- 91.8% white --- 2.5% Black --- 2.8% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.4% Asian

Canva

#36. Huron County

- Economic connectedness: 0.8 - Median Income: $51,924 - Population: 31,542 --- 95.7% white --- 0.4% Black --- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.6% Asian

Roberto Galan // Shutterstock

#35. Mecosta County

- Economic connectedness: 0.8 - Median Income: $48,440 - Population: 40,051 --- 91.7% white --- 2.9% Black --- 0.7% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 1.1% Asian

Canva

#34. Otsego County

- Economic connectedness: 0.81 - Median Income: $59,330 - Population: 25,016 --- 95% white --- 0.9% Black --- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.5% Asian

Fsendek // Shutterstock

#33. Montcalm County

- Economic connectedness: 0.81 - Median Income: $54,803 - Population: 66,430 --- 92.9% white --- 2.2% Black --- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.2% Asian

Canva

#32. St. Clair County

- Economic connectedness: 0.82 - Median Income: $62,847 - Population: 160,067 --- 92.7% white --- 2.3% Black --- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.5% Asian

Canva

#31. Chippewa County

- Economic connectedness: 0.82 - Median Income: $53,079 - Population: 37,091 --- 67.9% white --- 4.7% Black --- 13.5% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.9% Asian

Canva

#30. Benzie County

- Economic connectedness: 0.82 - Median Income: $68,875 - Population: 17,926 --- 93.3% white --- 0.4% Black --- 1.5% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.4% Asian

Canva

#29. Macomb County

- Economic connectedness: 0.83 - Median Income: $67,828 - Population: 879,123 --- 78.6% white --- 12.1% Black --- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 4.4% Asian

Canva

#28. Mackinac County

- Economic connectedness: 0.83 - Median Income: $52,989 - Population: 10,814 --- 73.3% white --- 3.5% Black --- 15.6% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.9% Asian

Canva

#27. Isabella County

- Economic connectedness: 0.84 - Median Income: $48,840 - Population: 65,623 --- 86.5% white --- 2.3% Black --- 3.3% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 1.6% Asian

Canva

#26. Ionia County

- Economic connectedness: 0.85 - Median Income: $64,436 - Population: 66,564 --- 90.5% white --- 4.4% Black --- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.5% Asian

Canva

#25. Ingham County

- Economic connectedness: 0.85 - Median Income: $58,226 - Population: 285,660 --- 72.8% white --- 12% Black --- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 6.5% Asian

Jim_Brown_Photography // Shutterstock

#24. Shiawassee County

- Economic connectedness: 0.85 - Median Income: $58,004 - Population: 68,203 --- 95.5% white --- 0.8% Black --- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.3% Asian

Roberto Galan // Shutterstock

#23. Lenawee County

- Economic connectedness: 0.85 - Median Income: $60,656 - Population: 99,346 --- 91.4% white --- 2.1% Black --- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.3% Asian

Canva

#22. Kalamazoo County

- Economic connectedness: 0.85 - Median Income: $61,739 - Population: 261,280 --- 79.1% white --- 11.1% Black --- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 2.4% Asian

Canva

#21. Dickinson County

- Economic connectedness: 0.85 - Median Income: $54,775 - Population: 25,954 --- 94.8% white --- 0.7% Black --- 0.9% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.5% Asian

Canva

#20. Charlevoix County

- Economic connectedness: 0.85 - Median Income: $63,508 - Population: 26,109 --- 94.5% white --- 0.5% Black --- 1.2% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.4% Asian

Canva

#19. Kent County

- Economic connectedness: 0.86 - Median Income: $69,786 - Population: 654,958 --- 76.8% white --- 9.5% Black --- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 3.1% Asian

Logan Bush // Shutterstock

#18. Lapeer County

- Economic connectedness: 0.88 - Median Income: $69,194 - Population: 88,644 --- 93.9% white --- 1.2% Black --- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.4% Asian

FefistoPhoto // Shutterstock

#17. Eaton County

- Economic connectedness: 0.89 - Median Income: $72,173 - Population: 108,972 --- 84.8% white --- 7.2% Black --- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 2.3% Asian

David Lingholm // Shutterstock

#16. Monroe County

- Economic connectedness: 0.89 - Median Income: $68,006 - Population: 154,068 --- 92.5% white --- 2.3% Black --- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.5% Asian

Canva

#15. Ontonagon County

- Economic connectedness: 0.89 - Median Income: $44,605 - Population: 5,891 --- 95.5% white --- 0.4% Black --- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.7% Asian

Canva

#14. Emmet County

- Economic connectedness: 0.89 - Median Income: $63,488 - Population: 33,946 --- 90.7% white --- 0.6% Black --- 2.6% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.5% Asian

Canva

#13. Midland County

- Economic connectedness: 0.89 - Median Income: $67,642 - Population: 83,467 --- 92% white --- 1.6% Black --- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 2.2% Asian

Canva

#12. Alger County

- Economic connectedness: 0.9 - Median Income: $48,822 - Population: 8,911 --- 83.3% white --- 7.1% Black --- 2.9% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.5% Asian

Canva

#11. Oakland County

- Economic connectedness: 0.9 - Median Income: $86,275 - Population: 1,271,983 --- 72.9% white --- 13.2% Black --- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 7.8% Asian

Canva

#10. Allegan County

- Economic connectedness: 0.91 - Median Income: $70,269 - Population: 119,418 --- 90.9% white --- 1.3% Black --- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.7% Asian

Canva

#9. Barry County

- Economic connectedness: 0.92 - Median Income: $68,779 - Population: 62,014 --- 95.4% white --- 0.5% Black --- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.6% Asian

Roberto Galan // Shutterstock

#8. Clinton County

- Economic connectedness: 0.96 - Median Income: $76,161 - Population: 78,895 --- 91.7% white --- 1.7% Black --- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 1.2% Asian

Canva

#7. Grand Traverse County

- Economic connectedness: 0.96 - Median Income: $69,393 - Population: 94,562 --- 94.1% white --- 0.8% Black --- 0.8% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.6% Asian

Canva

#6. Ottawa County

- Economic connectedness: 0.98 - Median Income: $77,288 - Population: 293,713 --- 87.6% white --- 1.7% Black --- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 2.7% Asian

Canva

#5. Houghton County

- Economic connectedness: 0.98 - Median Income: $48,623 - Population: 37,485 --- 92.7% white --- 1% Black --- 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 2.8% Asian

Canva

#4. Marquette County

- Economic connectedness: 1. - Median Income: $57,981 - Population: 66,380 --- 92.3% white --- 1.6% Black --- 1.1% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.7% Asian

Alexey Stiop // Shutterstock

#3. Leelanau County

- Economic connectedness: 1.03 - Median Income: $72,709 - Population: 22,251 --- 91.5% white --- 0.4% Black --- 3.2% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.6% Asian

Agnieszka Gaul // Shutterstock

#2. Washtenaw County

- Economic connectedness: 1.07 - Median Income: $79,198 - Population: 372,428 --- 72% white --- 11.7% Black --- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 9.1% Asian

Canva

#1. Livingston County

- Economic connectedness: 1.11 - Median Income: $88,908 - Population: 193,234 --- 95.4% white --- 0.5% Black --- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.9% Asian

This story features data reporting and writing by Dom DiFurio and is part of a series utilizing data automation across 50 states.

This story originally appeared on Wealth Enhancement Group and was produced and distributed in partnership with Stacker Studio.


Recommended Videos