INSIDER
Nightside Report April 7, 2021: Manager testifies about former employee accused of raping 17-year-old co-worker, Police say baby found abandoned near creek expected to be OK
Read full article: Nightside Report April 7, 2021: Manager testifies about former employee accused of raping 17-year-old co-worker, Police say baby found abandoned near creek expected to be OKHere are tonight's top stories.
Manager testifies about former employee accused of raping 17-year-old co-worker at Sterling Heights Jimmy Johnโs
Read full article: Manager testifies about former employee accused of raping 17-year-old co-worker at Sterling Heights Jimmy JohnโsA 17-year-old girl said she was sexually assaulted by a co-worker when she worked at Jimmy Johnโs in Sterling Heights.
Teen suing Sterling Heights Jimmy Johnโs store says she was raped by former co-worker
Read full article: Teen suing Sterling Heights Jimmy Johnโs store says she was raped by former co-workerSTERLING HEIGHTS, Mich. โ A 17-year-old and her family are suing the franchise of a Sterling Heights Jimmy Johnโs store after the teen said she was raped by a former employee. The teen, who has a disability, said that in August, Jerry Brown-Pegues forced her into a storage room and assaulted her. Documents show that the owner -- Turner Services Group in Clinton Township -- was aware of Brown-Peguesโ prior sexual assault crime and kept him on staff. He served time in prison, was out on parole and got a job as a delivery driver at the Jimmy Johnโs store. On Friday, attorneys for Turner Services said they are reviewing the case and declined to comment.
Buffalo Wild Wings owner to acquire Jimmy John's
Read full article: Buffalo Wild Wings owner to acquire Jimmy John'sThe owner of Sonic Drive-In, Arby's and Buffalo Wild Wings is making another addition to its growing restaurant empire: sandwich chain Jimmy John's. Inspire said the acquisition of Jimmy John's will make it the fourth-largest US restaurant company, with more than $14 billion in annual sales across 11,200 restaurants. "Jimmy John's is a great fit for the Inspire family," said Paul Brown, Inspire's co-founder and CEO. Inspire Brands, a private equity-backed firm that also owns Rusty Taco, said the agreement was unanimously approved by the Jimmy John's board of directors, including founder and chairman Jimmy John Liautaud. Jimmy John's, which has more than 2,800 locations in 43 states, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Jimmy John's Delivery Man Seems to Casually Put Mouth on Customer's Drink Before Dropping
Read full article: Jimmy John's Delivery Man Seems to Casually Put Mouth on Customer's Drink Before DroppingA Jimmy John's delivery man appeared to casually press his mouth to the lid of a drink he was dropping off in a moment captured on a home security camera. In the footage, the man, who was not identified, can be seen holding the food in one arm outside a Chicago area home. Then, he looks down at a cup in his other hand and appears to put his mouth on the lid where the straw goes. In a statement, Jimmy John's said "the behavior seen in this video is not consistent with the standards we expect from our employees." RELATED STORIESWater Delivery Man Saves Elderly Woman's Life After She Fell and Couldn't Get UpFamily Says Stalker Won't Stop Sending Deliverymen, Plumbers and Even Sex WorkersDelivery Man Stacks 6 Mattresses on the Roof of His Sports Car
Michigan woman with food allergy loses appeal over voice damage
Read full article: Michigan woman with food allergy loses appeal over voice damageKETV via CNNCOMSTOCK PARK, Mich. - A woman who says a Jimmy John's sandwich damaged her ability to speak has failed to persuade the Michigan appeals court to reinstate her lawsuit. Lindsey Bresnahan didn't want Dijon mustard on her sandwich, but the mustard was mistakenly used. The impact was severe: She had to undergo speech therapy to regain full use of her voice. But the appeals court agreed with a Kent County judge who said the Jimmy John's franchise in Comstock Park isn't liable, even if staff made a mistake. The court says it's unreasonable to require restaurants to treat menu modifications as a "possible severe food allergy."